Re: [PATCH] Updates for languages/PIR/docs/pirgrammar.pod

2007-02-07 Thread jerry gay
On 2/7/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 07 February 2007 12:25, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > absolutely true. I'm not sure; is pod2html present on any platform where > perl is? If so, then it can be incorporated into step.pm, (that makes > the Makefiles), so it can done when runn

Re: [PATCH] Updates for languages/PIR/docs/pirgrammar.pod

2007-02-07 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 12:25, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > absolutely true. I'm not sure; is pod2html present on any platform where > perl is? If so, then it can be incorporated into step.pm, (that makes > the Makefiles), so it can done when running make. > (likewise, make test could run podche

Re: [PATCH] Updates for languages/PIR/docs/pirgrammar.pod

2007-02-07 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
chromatic wrote: On Wednesday 07 February 2007 08:33, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: attached a patch for pirgrammar.pod and its html variant. Keeping this HTML in the repository sucks. Is there a possibilty that we could generate it automatically? What's preventing us from doing so? I un

Re: [PATCH] Updates for languages/PIR/docs/pirgrammar.pod

2007-02-07 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 08:33, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > attached a patch for pirgrammar.pod and its html variant. Keeping this HTML in the repository sucks. Is there a possibilty that we could generate it automatically? What's preventing us from doing so? I understand the rationale for s