Re: [PATCH] Removing two-arg ne

2002-10-12 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:01:49PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 9:02 PM +0100 10/11/02, Nicholas Clark wrote: > >I would like to kill all generated variants of all the 3 argument opcodes > >where both input arguments are constants. They truly are superfluous. > > Where both operands are ints

Re: [PATCH] Removing two-arg ne

2002-10-12 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:01:49PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >>At 9:02 PM +0100 10/11/02, Nicholas Clark wrote: >> > >>>I would like to kill all generated variants of all the 3 argument opcodes >>>where both input arguments are constants. They truly are superfluous.

Re: [PATCH] Removing two-arg ne

2002-10-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:02 PM +0100 10/11/02, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:30:33PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 7:10 PM +0200 10/10/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > >There are also 2 operand math operations of dubious achievement: >Each of them will be doubled for each RHS INT argument givin

Re: [PATCH] Removing two-arg ne

2002-10-11 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:30:33PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 7:10 PM +0200 10/10/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > > >There are also 2 operand math operations of dubious achievement: > >Each of them will be doubled for each RHS INT argument giving ~25 opcodes. > > Those are all for the: > >

Re: [PATCH] Removing two-arg ne

2002-10-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 7:10 PM +0200 10/10/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > >There are also 2 operand math operations of dubious achievement: > >5 add >2 sub >4 mul >1 div >2 mod > >Each of them will be doubled for each RHS INT argument giving ~25 opcodes. Those are all for the: a op= b form. There's a minor benef

Re: [PATCH] Removing two-arg ne

2002-10-11 Thread Steve Fink
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:06:54PM -0400, Simon Glover wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >> At 7:42 PM -0700 10/8/02, Steve Fink wrote: >>>Thanks, applied. >>> >>>Who came up with the idea of two-argument ne, anyway? That's kind of >>>bizarre. >> >> Definitely bizarre. I think

Re: [PATCH] Removing two-arg ne

2002-10-10 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Simon Glover wrote: > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > >>At 7:42 PM -0700 10/8/02, Steve Fink wrote: >> >>>Thanks, applied. >>> >>>Who came up with the idea of two-argument ne, anyway? That's kind of >>>bizarre. >>> >> >>Definitely bizarre. I think I'd rather not have it, it doesn't