Michael Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, on looking closer at that, could someone demuddle my ignorance and
> tell me why the t/src tests are not run under testj?
These don't have a run-loop, so you can't run these with any run-core.
A plain "make test" covers src tests, running src tests
$Config{archname} wasn't getting parsed quite right on OS X and so JIT
wasn't getting detected in some cases. I checked in a fix for that.
It's certainly nice to see the tests run faster.
make test
All tests successful, 49 subtests skipped.
Files=90, Tests=1289, 138 wallclock secs (47.38 cusr +
On Jan 7, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Adam Thomason wrote:
The 40 ops range from 0x200fca28 to 0x200fca90, with 0x200fca94 onward
being
".long 0x0". The pc at failure is 0x7c0802a4. So it's probably safe
to
assume the trouble is pre-pasm.
Yep, you're right. Thanks for all of the great information--I'm
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Clites [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:52 AM
> To: Adam Thomason
> Cc: Internals List
> Subject: Re: [perl #24829] RE: [PATCH] PPC JIT fixes
> [re-send] (Modified
> by Jeff Clites)
>
> 1) In
On Jan 6, 2004, at 3:28 PM, Adam Thomason (via RT) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Clites [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] PPC JIT fixes [re-send] (Modified by Jeff Clites)
7) I don't expect anything here to br
# New Ticket Created by Adam Thomason
# Please include the string: [perl #24829]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24829 >
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Clites [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wedn
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> {This is a re-send of my submission [perl #24789] from 12/31, which has
> not been forwarded from RT. I wanted to keep this separate from my
> subsequent [perl #24808] in order to preserve the change history.}
Thanks, applied.
leo
