Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-23 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Josh Wilmes wrote: > If all MANIFEST is is a list of all files in CVS, there are much easier > ways to get it. > > As I understand it, it's supposed to be a list of what goes into a tarball > to release the program, which might be a subset of what stays in CVS. > > Honest

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:21:41PM +, Simon Glover wrote: > > Please, people, if you create new files, remember to add them to the > MANIFEST. Is CVS flexible enough to let us run a manifest check on each commit and generate warnings that get sent somewhere useful if it fails? I seem to re

RE: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Tom Hughes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Brent Dax wrote: > > > There should be no Makefile.in's left in the source--they've been tossed > > in favor of config/gen/makefiles. > > Fair enough. I just took what cvs handed me. It w

RE: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Brent Dax wrote: > There should be no Makefile.in's left in the source--they've been tossed > in favor of config/gen/makefiles. Fair enough. I just took what cvs handed me. It was a fresh checkout as of yesterday, updated this morning. Whoever removes those files from the

RE: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Brent Dax
There should be no Makefile.in's left in the source--they've been tossed in favor of config/gen/makefiles. Andy Dougherty: # --- parrot-cvs/MANIFEST Sat Jul 13 13:04:15 2002 # +++ parrot-andy/MANIFEST Wed Jul 17 11:46:50 2002 # @@ -12,16 +12,15 @@ # VERSION # assemble.pl # byteorder

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote: > The following patch brings the MANIFEST file up-to-date with recent > additions. I haven't committed this in case some other reorganization > (e.g. moving stuff to a src/ or dev/ or doc/ directory) is underway. > > There are also a few minor shuffles

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update [APPLIED]

2002-01-30 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Simon Glover wrote: > > Enclosed patch adds the new SPARC-based JIT files to the manifest, > and also puts it back into alphabetical order. > > Simon > Applied thanks.

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-01-21 Thread Melvin Smith
At 12:21 PM 1/21/2002 +, Simon Glover wrote: > Please, people, if you create new files, remember to add them to the > MANIFEST. > > Simon > >--- MANIFEST.oldMon Jan 21 12:17:34 2002 >+++ MANIFESTMon Jan 21 12:18:47 2002 >@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ > examples/assembly/call.pasm > examp

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update.

2001-09-18 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > The following patch adds some missing files to MANIFEST. It also re-sorts > it for easier maintenance. It's probably a good idea to periodically run > > perl -MExtUtils::Manifest -e 'ExtUtils::Manifest::fullcheck' > > (or