Re: [Introspector-developers] Re: Bytecode metadata

2003-01-28 Thread Gopal V
If memory serves me right, James Michael DuPont wrote: > > > Bah. That's "parrot -o foo.o foo.pmc" isn't it? > > > > And if we make C a parrot supported language we can even build parrot > > with parrot? Hmmm... bootstrapping > 1. The gcc : I have %99 of the information about the function b

Re: [Introspector-developers] Re: Bytecode metadata

2003-01-27 Thread James Michael DuPont
--- Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I guess in future once the normal JIT works, and we've got the pigs > flying > > nicely then it would be possible to write a Not Just In Time > compiler that > > saves out assembly code and relocation