At 5:11 PM +0200 5/10/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1:36 PM +0200 5/10/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Interesting is the dispatch inside objects. These have a delegate
vtable which runs a PASM function. But it could be redispatched
before by installing an appr
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1:36 PM +0200 5/10/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>I think it's now time to review the code a bit and check if the
>>whole concept is sane.
> Looks OK.
Fine.
>>Interesting is the dispatch inside objects. These have a delegate
>>vtable which runs a PASM
At 1:36 PM +0200 5/10/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Things start to get interesting. The first two vtable slots are
gone. The dispatch for the C PMC opcodes is now down fully per
MMD.
The MMD_BXOR and MMD_BXOR_INT MMD slots are just adjacent entries in
the function table. This is the simplest impl
