Dan Sugalski wrote:
... (And I don't want
to go with an extra level of indirection for this, for speed reasons)
I did answer, nor do I, but recent cache coherency discussion could
imply, that eg. this wouldn't be to bad.
I thought of:
- a PMC is a handle (index) into
- array of pointers (e.g
At 6:17 PM +0100 12/30/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:45 AM +0100 12/30/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
A "simple" PMC would be a typical scalar (num or int) without
properties. Attaching properties to such a PMC would need
promoting it to a "complex" PMC.
We can't promote
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:45 AM +0100 12/30/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
A "simple" PMC would be a typical scalar (num or int) without
properties. Attaching properties to such a PMC would need promoting it
to a "complex" PMC.
We can't promote to a larger type, as that would require moving th
At 11:45 AM +0100 12/30/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
This is the next step in using a common PObj for Buffers/PMCs. The
major change is: free_unused_pobjects is now the common header
freeing function working on all Buffer & PMC headers.
Object specific destroying is done in free_unused_pobjects t
