Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's possible to customize this, if you want, or to write a tool looking
> for TODO tests, but this is the default, expected behavior.
I know. But it's more or less useless, when TODO tests are hidden in the
result. No one will look at these tests.
What abo
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 00:23, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> $ perl -Ilib t/pmc/object-meths.t
> 1..17
> ...
> not ok 17 - constructor - diamond parents # TODO wrong init order?
> # Failed (TODO) test (t/pmc/object-meths.t at line 469)
> ...
>
> $ perl -Ilib t/harness t/pmc/o*.t
> t/pmc/object-meths
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 00:28, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Object gurus, please have a look at t/pmc/object-meths_17. Is the code
>> ok? Is it failing because init order is really wrong?
>>
>> BTW I tried to add this test as a TODO but this seems not to work.
>
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 00:28, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Object gurus, please have a look at t/pmc/object-meths_17. Is the code
> ok? Is it failing because init order is really wrong?
>
> BTW I tried to add this test as a TODO but this seems not to work.
That's odd. If I uncomment line 467 ( loca
