Re: [CVS ci] branch_cs - intersegment branch

2003-01-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski wrote: At 6:13 PM +0100 1/22/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: IMHO plain jumps do not work: Sure they do. They work as well as jumps within code, which also has a not-insignificant potential for problems. But the issues you raised are some of the reasons I'd prefer inter-segment jum

Re: [CVS ci] branch_cs - intersegment branch

2003-01-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:13 PM +0100 1/22/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski wrote: At 4:53 PM +0100 1/22/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: This patch adds a new opcde for intersegment branches. I named it "branch_cs". This takes one $I param, which is the entry in the fixuptable. Thanks to Jason Gloudon for hintin

Re: [CVS ci] branch_cs - intersegment branch

2003-01-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski wrote: At 4:53 PM +0100 1/22/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: This patch adds a new opcde for intersegment branches. I named it "branch_cs". This takes one $I param, which is the entry in the fixuptable. Thanks to Jason Gloudon for hinting me, how to handle this beast. (s thread "[perl #

Re: [CVS ci] branch_cs - intersegment branch

2003-01-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 4:53 PM +0100 1/22/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: This patch adds a new opcde for intersegment branches. I named it "branch_cs". This takes one $I param, which is the entry in the fixuptable. Thanks to Jason Gloudon for hinting me, how to handle this beast. (s thread "[perl #20315] [PATCH] eval - i