Garrett Goebel wrote:
>
> From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > I'm going to try to have the assembler done over the weekend,
> > with at the least hooks for a macro system so that people can
> > work on pieces of that.
>
> Are you working with Simon Cozens' unchecked-in assembler? Or
>
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I'm going to try to have the assembler done over the weekend,
> with at the least hooks for a macro system so that people can
> work on pieces of that.
Are you working with Simon Cozens' unchecked-in assembler? Or
yet-another-assembler? My understanding
Steve Fink wrote:
>
> I'm not worried about your new make system being a bad idea. I do
> wonder if it's a wheel that's been invented before, but that's not my
> real concern. My real concern is that it sounds like this is slowing
> the introduction of the new assembler, and *that* is blocking mu
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:04:14PM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
> >Without knowing too much about it, I still have to wonder what is
> >wrong with cons? I thought it was a fully functional all-perl make
> >replacement.
>
> One reason not to use cons is that we will have to port it to
> parrot/perl6
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 04:04 PM, Robert Spier wrote:
> One of the keys of the system Jeff has implemented is that it's 100%
> real perl code and real perl objects, not a language parsed with
> perl. This means you can do nifty things and write perl code to
> modify things in a natural w
>Without knowing too much about it, I still have to wonder what is
>wrong with cons? I thought it was a fully functional all-perl make
>replacement.
One reason not to use cons is that we will have to port it to
parrot/perl6 in order to become self hosting, another, is that it
may not meet all of
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:10:55AM -0400, Jeff wrote:
> In between attempting to get the new assembler up and running (currently
> dealing with XS issues), Robert Spiers and I have come up with a new
> make mechanism.
XS? Is this a different assembler than Simon Cozen's? I assume so,
since I've h
