On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 19:38:12 -0400, Geoffrey Young
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just out of curiosity, what's the word on 0.49?
I've finally summoned the willpower to wrestle with Aegis to make
branch closing not be a gulag-like exercise. 0.49 is ready to go
except for some silly looking merge bu
hi all :)
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> http://mungus.schwern.org/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.48_02.tar.gz
>
> A new alpha release of Test::Simple/More/Builder. You can consider this
> the 0.49 release candidate. Please let me know how it goes.
just out of curiosity, what's the word on 0.49?
--Ge
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Lovely, thanks. As soon as I hear Test::Builder::Tester has adjusted
> for the formatting change I'll release this as 0.49.
Right! If you're going to be like that I'll release TBT then!
The uploaded file
Test-Builder-Tester-1.01.tar.gz
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:07:39 -0700, Geoffrey Young
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the Apache-Test integration stuff we talked about at YAPC works just fine
> with 0.48_02.
Lovely, thanks. As soon as I hear Test::Builder::Tester has adjusted
for the formatting change I'll release this as 0.49.
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> http://mungus.schwern.org/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.48_02.tar.gz
>
> A new alpha release of Test::Simple/More/Builder. You can consider this
> the 0.49 release candidate. Please let me know how it goes.
sorry it took me so long to get around to trying this...
the
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Adrian Howard wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to get the new T::B::T out before the new
> Test::Simple distribution? That way people can update dependencies and
> avoid test failures when the new T::S hits CPAN.
Yes, it would be. So as someone tells me that this feature is fi
On 19 Jul 2004, at 20:30, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Adrian Howard wrote:
My temptation is to say the new behaviour is the right one and patch
T::B::T and friends?
The version of TBT in my subversion repository[1] now twiddles the
HARNESS_ACTIVE ENV variable off when it's collecting ou
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Adrian Howard wrote:
> My temptation is to say the new behaviour is the right one and patch
> T::B::T and friends?
The version of TBT in my subversion repository[1] now twiddles the
HARNESS_ACTIVE ENV variable off when it's collecting output for testing.
I'll release it to C
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> Which causes anything testing test diagnostic output with
> Test::Builder::Tester to fall over. Test::Class, Test::Exception &
> Test::Block's test suites now all fail.
>
> Pooh sticks.
>
> My temptation is to say the new behaviou
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Which causes anything testing test diagnostic output with
> Test::Builder::Tester to fall over. Test::Class, Test::Exception &
> Test::Block's test suites now all fail.
Ooof, good catch. I'd really hate to have
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2004, at 07:25, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> [snip]
> >There's a new feature. When run under Test::Harness diagnostic output
> >will
> >throw in a leading newline for better readability.
> [snip]
>
> Which causes anything t
On 19 Jul 2004, at 07:25, Michael G Schwern wrote:
[snip]
There's a new feature. When run under Test::Harness diagnostic output
will
throw in a leading newline for better readability.
[snip]
Which causes anything testing test diagnostic output with
Test::Builder::Tester to fall over. Test::Class
12 matches
Mail list logo
