Re: Rakudo's fork queue on GitHub

2009-03-02 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:56:55PM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote: > On Feb 28, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:46:10AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: >>> On Feb 28, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: So, for the time being Rakudo's official policy wil

Re: Rakudo's fork queue on GitHub

2009-03-02 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:06:53AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: > So how about this for the workflow, Patrick: > > 1) Developer creates a branch to work on a feature or cleanup or > whatever > 2) Developer commits to dev/rakudo work branch however much she wants. > 3) Developer merges back to dev/ra

Re: Rakudo's fork queue on GitHub

2009-03-01 Thread Chris Dolan
On Mar 1, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Andy Lester wrote: So how about this for the workflow, Patrick: 1) Developer creates a branch to work on a feature or cleanup or whatever 2) Developer commits to dev/rakudo work branch however much she wants. 3) Developer merges back to dev/rakudo master branch

Re: Rakudo's fork queue on GitHub

2009-03-01 Thread Andy Lester
So how about this for the workflow, Patrick: 1) Developer creates a branch to work on a feature or cleanup or whatever 2) Developer commits to dev/rakudo work branch however much she wants. 3) Developer merges back to dev/rakudo master branch with a "squash" option. 4) Developer posts me

Re: Rakudo's fork queue on GitHub

2009-02-28 Thread Chris Dolan
On Feb 28, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:46:10AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: On Feb 28, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: So, for the time being Rakudo's official policy will be to accept patch submissions via RT. I've now cleared the fork

Re: Rakudo's fork queue on GitHub

2009-02-28 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:46:10AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > >> So, for the time being Rakudo's official policy will be to >> accept patch submissions via RT. I've now cleared the fork queue >> on GitHub; any patches that were previousl

Re: Rakudo's fork queue on GitHub

2009-02-28 Thread Andy Lester
On Feb 28, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: So, for the time being Rakudo's official policy will be to accept patch submissions via RT. I've now cleared the fork queue on GitHub; any patches that were previously there need to be resubmitted. My understanding is that this is bad

Rakudo's fork queue on GitHub

2009-02-28 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
A few people have asked about submitting patches via the "fork queue" on GitHub; after working with the queue this morning and largely being frustrated by it, I'm going to request that patches continue to be submitted as patches through RT. The biggest difficulty that I'm encounter with the fork q