There are some potentially crufty tickets out there. Can the relevant experts
verify if these can be closed before we get the next release out?
Win32: (10 tickets)
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/List.html?Field=Platform&Value=mswin32
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/List.html?Field=Platf
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ugh. No more coffee at night!
> On the plus side, we're now at 87 new parrot calls, and 38 open calls.
> (down from about 150
Thanks, great
leo
Ugh. No more coffee at night!
On the plus side, we're now at 87 new parrot calls, and 38 open calls.
(down from about 150 open calls when I started looking at the queue) (a
good chunk of them were due to a very large influx of spam recently,
which Robert cleared me to get rid of - but there wer
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 02:00 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
> >On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> > > My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we don't need
> > > ability to have keywords as variables. Compilers can generate all
> > > variables
At 02:00 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we don't need
> ability to have keywords as variables. Compilers can generate all
> variables with names like $T01JHGJ_001
That can make it kind of nas
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 07:26 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> >Melvin:
> >
> >Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you:
> >int main () {
> >> int if = 1;
> >>
> >> if (if) {
> >> if = 0;
> >> }
> >>}
>
> My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we
At 07:26 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
Melvin:
Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you:
int main () {
int if = 1;
if (if) {
if = 0;
}
}
do you have a patch? I think its a nice to have so If you sourself
provide a nice patch guess it would be applied :)
I thought I replied to this
Melvin:
Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you:
http://bugs6.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24251
I don't have a suggested patch, sorry.
Regards.
On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 04:42 PM, Stephane Peiry wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 01:42, Will Coleda wrote:
24251 - warnocked
I don't like
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
> Try
> cd languages/perl6
> ./perl6 --force-grammar -e 1 # don't worry if it fails
> make test
$ ./perl6 --force-grammar -e 1
error:imcc:fixup_bsrs: couldn't find addr of sub '_main'
Error: '/home/doughera/src/parrot/parrot-andy/parrot -r __eval_
Andrew Dougherty wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error 1 years
Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
How recentl
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error
> >1 years
> >
> > Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
>
> How recently did you check? I
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error
> 1 years
>
> Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
How recently did you check? I committed a reimplementation of perl6
regexes abou
On Sat, 1 Feb 2004, Stephane Peiry wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the
> requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email
> address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these
> as obsolete (unless they are
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 23039 [PATCH] event handling-2
A similar patch is in, either applied or obsolete and resolved.
> 16300 [BUG] hash clone hangs
> 17158 [PACTH] reduce size of core_ops_prederef.* by a fair amount
> 17244 [PACTH] hash ops at runtime for op_code() looku
--- Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the
> requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email
> address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these
> as obsolete (unless they are obvio
Hi All,
Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the
requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email
address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these
as obsolete (unless they are obviously resolved, "patch applied" or
else ;)
Thanks
Sorry for the singletons in the previous messages, didn't expect to
find more than the first.
This isn't meant to be a canonical list of close-able things, just
those I found poking around for several minutes.
In the "open" queue, there are 5 calls that range from 10 months to two
years old th
22998 is an Applied [PATCH], still listed as new, unassigned.
Regards.
--
Will "Coke" Coledawill at coleda
dot com
18 matches
Mail list logo
