(reply-to set to bootstrap)
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 01:36:47AM -0600, Tony Olekshy wrote:
>On this matter, should something like this be a (meta) RFC?
>
> Guidelines for Developing Changes for Perl 6 (v0.1).
There's nothing to stop you writing an RFC on whatever you like :)
However, there's not
On this matter, should something like this be a (meta) RFC?
=head1 TITLE
Guidelines for Developing Changes for Perl 6 (v0.1).
=head1 ABSTRACT
- If Perl 5 functionality is not broken (at least for some uses),
then don't change it unless a critical required core change
imples the cha
Last night we had a Melbourne.pm dinner and we were, of course,
discussing Perl 6 and the language RFCs.
Something that became apparent was that the RFCs are a tad confusing,
and we came up with some things which we thought might help.
Firstly, an RFC should usually only address one point. Some
