Re: RFC 200 (v2) Objects: Revamp tie to support extensibility (Massive tie changes)

2000-09-21 Thread Piers Cawley
Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I didn't see any mention of my plea that C should pass the > original variable being tied as one of its arguments. :-( > > E.g.: > > sub ReadOnly::TIESCALAR { > my ($class, $original, @otherargs) = @_; > bless { >

Re: RFC 200 (v2) Objects: Revamp tie to support extensibility(Massive tie changes)

2000-09-20 Thread Nathan Wiger
Damian Conway wrote: > > I didn't see any mention of my plea that C should pass the > original variable being tied as one of its arguments. :-( That's because it's a dumb idea!! **Kidding!** I forgot about this, sorry. I'll add it to the next version ;-) > my $x = 10; > ti

Re: RFC 200 (v2) Objects: Revamp tie to support extensibility (Massive tie changes)

2000-09-20 Thread Damian Conway
I didn't see any mention of my plea that C should pass the original variable being tied as one of its arguments. :-( E.g.: sub ReadOnly::TIESCALAR { my ($class, $original, @otherargs) = @_; bless { internals => \@otherargs,

RFC 200 (v2) Objects: Revamp tie to support extensibility (Massive tie changes)

2000-09-20 Thread Perl6 RFC Librarian
This and other RFCs are available on the web at http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ =head1 TITLE Objects: Revamp tie to support extensibility (Massive tie changes) =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 7 Sep 2000 Last Modified: 20 Sep 2000 Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTEC