> "JM" == James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> If those two paragraps (and the two after them) are replaced with < what's still wrong with the RFC?
JM> Therefore, return values of lvalue subs stay as their final GV, which is
JM> passed into the assignment, and is then assigned to the
From: "Chaim Frenkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: RFC 149 (v1) Lvalue subroutines: implicit and explicit
assignment
PRL> Therefore, the definition of the return function must be changed
PRL> such that it is lazy.
PRL> Additi
> "PRL" == Perl6 RFC Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PRL> Therefore, the definition of the return function must be changed
PRL> such that it is lazy.
PRL> Additionally, the definition of assignment must not normally
PRL> evaluate a lazy expression, but rather evaluate it to the point
P
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Lvalue subroutines: implicit and explicit assignment
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 24 Aug 2000
Version: 1
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 149
S
