Re: S29 update ready

2006-07-09 Thread Aaron Sherman
Darren Duncan wrote: At 8:32 PM -0400 7/8/06, Joe Gottman wrote: I have one minor comment about join. You should specify its behavior when it is passed an empty list. Does it return undef or the empty string? I think it makes the most sense for it to return an empty string, which is a reas

RE: S29 update ready

2006-07-08 Thread Darren Duncan
At 8:32 PM -0400 7/8/06, Joe Gottman wrote: I have one minor comment about join. You should specify its behavior when it is passed an empty list. Does it return undef or the empty string? I think it makes the most sense for it to return an empty string, which is a reasonable degenerate case

RE: S29 update ready

2006-07-08 Thread Darren Duncan
At 6:25 PM -0700 7/8/06, Darren Duncan wrote: At 8:32 PM -0400 7/8/06, Joe Gottman wrote: I have one minor comment about join. You should specify its behavior when it is passed an empty list. Does it return undef or the empty string? I think it makes the most sense for it to return an empty

RE: S29 update ready

2006-07-08 Thread Joe Gottman
> -Original Message- > From: Aaron Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 6:05 PM > To: Perl6 Language List > Subject: S29 update ready > > I've gathered my ducks in a row, used the feedback that I've gotten so > far, and I think I'm ready to officially update

Re: S29 update ready

2006-07-08 Thread Larry Wall
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 06:04:40PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote: : I've gathered my ducks in a row, used the feedback that I've gotten so : far, and I think I'm ready to officially update S29. For that I need two : things: : : 1) I'd really like Larry to glance over the changes and $s29.bless but