RE: Numeric Literals (Summary) [x-bayes][x-adr]

2002-11-20 Thread Garrett Goebel
From: Luke Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > From: Martin D Kealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 10:1.2.3:4.5:6== 12345 > > 2:1:1:1110== 0x6000 > > 60:22.0.-27::-2 == 21.9925 > > I've always wanted to meet The Devil. :) > > Honestly, I can't tell by looking at that what thos

RE: String to Num (was Re: Numeric Literals (Summary)) [x-bayes][ x-adr]

2002-11-20 Thread Garrett Goebel
From: Michael Lazzaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > and _I'm_ trying to promote the reuse of the old "oct/hex" > functions to do a similar both-way thing, such that: [...] > but people just aren't biting, so far. Don't see why > not, I think it's keen. There's the problem Larry ment