Simon Cozens:
# Brent Dax:
# > I was afraid you were gonna say that. :^) I'll put it
# back in my next
# > embedding patch.
#
# And document this exchange in the Embedding PDD? :)
I probably will--after I write the regex PDD. :^)
--Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parrot Configure pumpking, regex
Brent Dax:
> I was afraid you were gonna say that. :^) I'll put it back in my next
> embedding patch.
And document this exchange in the Embedding PDD? :)
--
Ever wake up feeling like a null pointer? -Allan Pratt
Dan Sugalski:
# On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
#
# > Melvin Smith:
# > # At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
# > # >Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
# > # >-struct Parrot_Interp {
# > # >+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
# > # > struct IReg int_reg;
# >
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
> Melvin Smith:
> # At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
> # >Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
> # >-struct Parrot_Interp {
> # >+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
> # > struct IReg int_reg;
> # > struct NReg num_reg;
>
Melvin Smith:
# At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
# >Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
# >-struct Parrot_Interp {
# >+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
# > struct IReg int_reg;
# > struct NReg num_reg;
# > struct SReg string_reg;
# >@@ -87,7 +86,7 @@
At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
>Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
>-struct Parrot_Interp {
>+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
> struct IReg int_reg;
> struct NReg num_reg;
> struct SReg string_reg;
>@@ -87,7 +86,7 @@
> void *current_package;
