Re: Prospective jit patch

2002-04-01 Thread Jason Gloudon
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:33:02AM -0300, Daniel Grunblatt wrote: > Did you continue working on this or can I take this patch to continue? I haven't made any changes since then so you can work off this patch. -- Jason

Re: Prospective jit patch

2002-03-31 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Jason Gloudon wrote: > > This is a not-yet-suitable for applying patch that removes the dependency on an > external assembler and disassembler for Just-In-Time compiler support. All > assembly is done at run-time via macros. This is sufficient to allow some > flexibility in

Prospective jit patch

2002-03-24 Thread Jason Gloudon
This is a not-yet-suitable for applying patch that removes the dependency on an external assembler and disassembler for Just-In-Time compiler support. All assembly is done at run-time via macros. This is sufficient to allow some flexibility in instruction selection at run-time, but a lot more wo