CVS Diff Options Suggestion [was: Re: Problem with MANIFEST(missing io/io_unix.c)]

2002-01-09 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Dan, Melvin and Co. -- I find that if I've used cvs add and cvs remove for any added or removed files, I can create a patch quite nicely from the root directory thusly: $ cvs -q diff -NauR > ../foo.patch YMMV. Regards, -- gregor ___

Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 02:55 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: >I suspect its the diff flags I use when I send to Dan. I use -urN (or >--newfile) >which should create the new file if it doesn't exist but this happened last >time >I made a new file as well. That always worked when I used to send patches >to linu

Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread Melvin Smith
To: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Melvin Smith/ATLANTA/Contr/IBM@IBMUS, Parrot Internals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c) On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 02:39 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: >

Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 01:50 PM 1/9/2002 -0600, David M. Lloyd wrote: >On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > At 02:39 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: > > >Must be Dan's magic fingers again. I renamed io_os.c to io_unix.c but > > >probably > > >it got lost in the shuffle. > > > > Weird. It's in my local

Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 02:50 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: >Just resynced, still missing io/io_unix.c, interestingly the other new file >in the patch >(io_win32.c) made it in. Gah, I was looking at the manifest file--I thought that's where I'd forgotten the change. Just added and committed io/io_unix.c to

Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread David M. Lloyd
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 02:39 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: > >Must be Dan's magic fingers again. I renamed io_os.c to io_unix.c but > >probably > >it got lost in the shuffle. > > Weird. It's in my local MANIFEST from the patch, and CVS is convinced > that it's up to

Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread Melvin Smith
80.pcx) To: Melvin Smith/ATLANTA/Contr/IBM@IBMUS, "David M. Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Parrot Internals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c) At 02:39 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: >Must

Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
Parrot Internals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc: >Subject: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c) > > >Revision 1.89 of MANIFEST introduced io/io_unix.c, but configure dies >becuase the file isn't there... Da

Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread Melvin Smith
pic22062.pcx) To: Parrot Internals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c) Revision 1.89 of MANIFEST introduced io/io_unix.c, but configure dies becuase the file isn't there... - D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pic22062.pcx Description: Binary data

Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c)

2002-01-09 Thread David M. Lloyd
Revision 1.89 of MANIFEST introduced io/io_unix.c, but configure dies becuase the file isn't there... - D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>