Re: Possible new PMC

2002-02-22 Thread Melvin Smith
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Possible new PMC

Re: Possible new PMC

2002-02-22 Thread Alex Gough
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Melvin Smith wrote: > Exactly. If we added this to String I think it would work. I don't know if that's exactly what you want. A string is a list of integers corresponding to character points and nothing more than that so probably doesn't form a good vehicle for a packed da

Re: Possible new PMC

2002-02-22 Thread Melvin Smith
At 08:16 AM 2/22/2002 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: >On Friday 22 February 2002 01:01, Melvin Smith wrote: > > I want to emulate a packed structure with Parrot in the way a compiler > > would normally do this for a low level machine. > > > > It just needs traditional notation for setting fields b

Re: Possible new PMC

2002-02-22 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
On Friday 22 February 2002 01:01, Melvin Smith wrote: > I want to emulate a packed structure with Parrot in the way a compiler > would normally do this for a low level machine. > > It just needs traditional notation for setting fields by offset into > the struct. > > I sort of feel that PerlString

Possible new PMC

2002-02-21 Thread Melvin Smith
I want to emulate a packed structure with Parrot in the way a compiler would normally do this for a low level machine. It just needs traditional notation for setting fields by offset into the struct. I sort of feel that PerlString _could_ handle this, but I'm curious if there are any gotchas I'm