At 5:53 PM -0700 8/17/04, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
Michel Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if Perl or other languages want an undef returned, it would seem to make
more sense that they assume to cost of catching the exception and
turning it into an undef, than everyone else turning th
Michel Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if Perl or other languages want an undef returned, it would seem to make
> more sense that they assume to cost of catching the exception and
> turning it into an undef, than everyone else turning the undef into an
> exception.
I believe that this is ex
ng a catchable error if the array is empty on pop:
pop $P0, .STACK # throws exception
if Perl or other languages want an undef returned, it would seem to make
more sense that they assume to cost of catching the exception and
turning it into an undef, than everyone else turning the undef into an
exception. Popping an empty stack to feels much more "exceptional" to
me than an operation that results in an undef.
-Michel
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:15:01AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Michel Pelletier writes:
: > > We have to through an IndexError exception for Python. But that's not
: > > done yet.
: >
: > Okay, I'll keep depth checking. I thought about attempting a patch, but
: > Larry says return an undef contai
Michel Pelletier writes:
> > We have to through an IndexError exception for Python. But that's not
> > done yet.
>
> Okay, I'll keep depth checking. I thought about attempting a patch, but
> Larry says return an undef containing an unthrown exception, Dan wonders
> if it should be an empty undef,
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:54:32 +0200
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michel Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > $P0 = new .PerlArray
> > pop $P1, $P0
>
> > kills the process with a 'Array index out of bounds!'. Is there a way
> > to get an exception I can catch out of this?
>
Michel Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $P0 = new .PerlArray
> pop $P1, $P0
> kills the process with a 'Array index out of bounds!'. Is there a way
> to get an exception I can catch out of this?
We have to through an IndexError exception for Python. But that's not
done yet.
> -Michel
le
At 10:51 AM -0700 8/16/04, Larry Wall wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:09:45AM -0700, Michel Pelletier wrote:
:
: $P0 = new .PerlArray
: pop $P1, $P0
:
: kills the process with a 'Array index out of bounds!'. Is there a way
: to get an exception I can catch out of this? Right now I check the
: d
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:09:45AM -0700, Michel Pelletier wrote:
:
: $P0 = new .PerlArray
: pop $P1, $P0
:
: kills the process with a 'Array index out of bounds!'. Is there a way
: to get an exception I can catch out of this? Right now I check the
: depth every time I want to pop, which adds a
$P0 = new .PerlArray
pop $P1, $P0
kills the process with a 'Array index out of bounds!'. Is there a way
to get an exception I can catch out of this? Right now I check the
depth every time I want to pop, which adds a lot of overhead per pop.
TIA,
-Michel
10 matches
Mail list logo
