On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:18:17AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: We could reserve all the is_* isnt_* ok_* names for that, I suppose.
I've gone ahead and done that. Let me also reiterate here in public
the basic underlying premise that "fudge" is only for fudging the
tests, and a truly passing test
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:38:32AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: Nice. What about the cases where a test file defines its own local
: wrapper functions to is, isnt, like, etc.? For example, Pugs'
: t/builtins/math/sqrt.t has:
:
: sub is_approx (Num $is, Num $expected, Str $descr) {
:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:16:57PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 11:22:44PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> : Larry, Jerry, and I discussed this a couple of weeks ago
> : and here's my vision for how it should work. To simplify
> : things, let's break it into two parts: (1
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 11:22:44PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 11:35:17PM +0100, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
: > - Is [1] the correct way of declaring "todo" tests?
: > What's the equivalent in new compiler directives
: > of `:todo', `:todo', and ':todo'?
: > [1] t/sp
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 11:35:17PM +0100, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> - Are smartlinks "stackable?"
> That is, can I refer the same code to multiple links?
> http://perlsix.org/svn/pugs/revision?rev=19471
According to the documentation in smartlinks.pl, they are.
See http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs
On Jan 14, 2008 6:35 AM, Cosimo Streppone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Are smartlinks "stackable?"
> That is, can I refer the same code to multiple links?
> http://perlsix.org/svn/pugs/revision?rev=19471
>
Yes, sure you can :) From util/smartlinks.pl's POD:
Multiple adjacent smartlink
Hi all,
I'm working on refactoring the perl6 spec test suite.
I have some doubts that probably some of you can clarify.
- Are smartlinks "stackable?"
That is, can I refer the same code to multiple links?
http://perlsix.org/svn/pugs/revision?rev=19471
- Is [1] the correct w
