On 07/30/2010 12:31 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
Am 30.07.2010 09:24, schrieb Richard Hainsworth:
Would it be possible to require that any module listed in the proto list
s/require/suggest/
proto inclusion already requires a dependency file,
No. It's perfectly fine to have none, if the module has no
Am 30.07.2010 09:24, schrieb Richard Hainsworth:
The number of modules available to proto has grown considerably.
I am not aware that there is a convenient way of obtaining a short
description about each module, other than just the name?
http://modules.perl6.org/ contains a short description,
On Fri, 2010-30-07 at 11:07 -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> I *really* want to use a multi-language-savvy spec like this to
> distribute with.
CPAN will also have to be able to handle modules written in arbitrary
natural languages (chinese, arabic etc) will it not ?
--
--gh
Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:27, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
Just an opinion: imho every effort should go towards integrating CPAN
in any way.
Maybe any of those META2.0, cpanminus, CPAN::Packager,
CPAN::Dpendency, MyCPAN::*, POD6 thingies could be assembled into
something to
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 04:08:49PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 01:27 PM, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
> >Richard Hainsworth writes:
> >>I am not aware that there is a convenient way of obtaining a short
> >>description about each module, other than just the name?
> >
> >Perl withou
On Fri, 2010-30-07 at 16:08 +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> All I am suggesting is that the directories containing modules also
> contain a METADATA file with some standard items, and that this
> metadata
> is required for a module that is registered. Even if there is a CPAN
> system, the met
On 07/30/2010 01:27 PM, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
Richard Hainsworth writes:
The number of modules available to proto has grown considerably.
I am not aware that there is a convenient way of obtaining a short
description about each module, other than just the name?
Just an opinion: im
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:27, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
> Just an opinion: imho every effort should go towards integrating CPAN
> in any way.
>
> Perl without CPAN feels like Kung-Fu on stack-heel shoe.
>
> Maybe any of those META2.0, cpanminus, CPAN::Packager,
> CPAN::Dpendency, MyCPAN::*, POD6 t
Richard Hainsworth writes:
> The number of modules available to proto has grown considerably.
>
> I am not aware that there is a convenient way of obtaining a short
> description about each module, other than just the name?
Just an opinion: imho every effort should go towards integrating CPAN
in
The number of modules available to proto has grown considerably.
I am not aware that there is a convenient way of obtaining a short
description about each module, other than just the name?
In order to make the perl6 internet-wide environment useful, there needs
to be some form of directory in
10 matches
Mail list logo