Re: Perl Core Tests

2003-10-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:12:53AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 10:46, Ovid wrote: > > > I was browsing through the Perl core tests and I saw that some tests in the t/uni/ > > directory used > > Test::More, but most other tests would explicitly '

Re: Perl Core Tests

2003-10-16 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Chromatic wrote in perl.qa : > > Stuff in t/op mostly can't use Test or Test::More because those modules > rely on the features being tested. Most everything else can use > Test::More. Barring any Unicode-related fiascos (of which I am proudly > and blissfully unaware), they probably haven't bee

Re: Perl Core Tests

2003-10-16 Thread chromatic
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 10:46, Ovid wrote: > I was browsing through the Perl core tests and I saw that some tests in the t/uni/ > directory used > Test::More, but most other tests would explicitly 'print "ok 1\n"'. > > Is this to reduce the dependancy of the cor

Perl Core Tests

2003-10-16 Thread Ovid
I was browsing through the Perl core tests and I saw that some tests in the t/uni/ directory used Test::More, but most other tests would explicitly 'print "ok 1\n"'. Is this to reduce the dependancy of the core tests on external modules (and if so, why does t/uni/ not follo