OK, this is advance warning that I'm about to be reposting a bunch
of patches of mine which appear to have succumbed to Warnock's Dilemma.
The first three should be uncontroversial: there's a documentation fix-up
for core.ops, and new tests for strings and stacks. The last one is
rather lar
At 10:40 PM 4/10/2002 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Wednesday 10 April 2002 12:53 pm, Melvin Smith wrote:
> > I think there is at least one outstanding patch from Brian Warnock called:
> > "stacks.c"
>
>Hmmm, looking in my outbox, I see only one recent patch of mine
>that mentions stacks.c, a
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 12:53 pm, Melvin Smith wrote:
> I think there is at least one outstanding patch from Brian Warnock called:
> "stacks.c"
Hmmm, looking in my outbox, I see only one recent patch of mine
that mentions stacks.c, and its been applied. (Although I don't know when.
It could
At 12:53 PM -0400 4/10/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>At 12:40 PM 4/10/2002 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>To forestall potential incidents of Warnock's Dillemma...
>>
>>I'm about to apply a whole heap 'o patches to Parrot. (With
>>appropriate [APPLIED] responses, I hope) If, at the end of the day,
>>I
At 12:40 PM 4/10/2002 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>To forestall potential incidents of Warnock's Dillemma...
>
>I'm about to apply a whole heap 'o patches to Parrot. (With appropriate
>[APPLIED] responses, I hope) If, at the end of the day, I have *not*
>applied or commented on a patch you've sen
To forestall potential incidents of Warnock's Dillemma...
I'm about to apply a whole heap 'o patches to Parrot. (With
appropriate [APPLIED] responses, I hope) If, at the end of the day, I
have *not* applied or commented on a patch you've sent, it means I've
Officially Missed It, so give anothe
