Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > [perl #23034][PATCH] Implementation of methods for PIOs
>> > [perl #23124][PATCH] [PATCH] Standard filehandles in the interpreter
> Each patch on its own worked. But both had diffrent assumptions about
> the order of initialisation. This is fixed n
? log.9392.gz
? test.imc
? mprout.pl
? docs/core_ops.pod
? docs/io_ops.pod
? io/Makefile
? t/src/staticstring.t
? t/src/valgrind.t
Index: build_nativecall.pl
===
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/build_nativecall.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.
Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question about the status of my patches:
> [perl #23034][PATCH] Implementation of methods for PIOs
> [perl #23124][PATCH] [PATCH] Standard filehandles in the interpreter
> are now PMCs.
I applied both locally, but:
1) I get segfa
Juergen Boemmels wrote:
I have a question about the status of my patches:
[perl #23034][PATCH] Implementation of methods for PIOs
[perl #23124][PATCH] [PATCH] Standard filehandles in the interpreter
are now PMCs.
There was very little feedback to this.
I didn't have a closer look yet,
At 15:10 +0200 7/29/03, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
I have a question about the status of my patches:
[perl #23034][PATCH] Implementation of methods for PIOs
[perl #23124][PATCH] [PATCH] Standard filehandles in the interpreter
are now PMCs.
There was very little feedback to this.
Can someo
I have a question about the status of my patches:
[perl #23034][PATCH] Implementation of methods for PIOs
[perl #23124][PATCH] [PATCH] Standard filehandles in the interpreter
are now PMCs.
There was very little feedback to this.
Can someone give me some feedback to the patches or if t
> Here's a couple more that I just stumbled across - they've not been
> picked up automatically because they don't have [PATCH] in the header.
> (16077) 'assign' opcode and unmorphing
> (16098) First draft of PerlScalar PMC
I've tagged them both as patches, so they'll show up in the list now.
-R
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Robert Spier wrote:
>
> http://www.parrotcode.org/openpatches
>
> There are a _lot_ of Pending patches.
>
> Within a few weeks, I hope to have an automated email nudging about
> this weekly.
>
Here's a couple more that I just stumbled across - they've not been
picked up aut
http://www.parrotcode.org/openpatches
There are a _lot_ of Pending patches.
Within a few weeks, I hope to have an automated email nudging about
this weekly.
-R
(801) [PATCH] PerlArray in scalar context Pending
(15345) [PATCH] Generating assemble.pl Pending
(15574) [PATCH] RECALL renamed to
