Re: PMC support

2001-11-08 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 09:33 PM 11/8/2001 +0100, Benoit Cerrina wrote: > > At 10:22 AM 11/8/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote: > > >I haven't seen much activity surrounding this. I figured there'd be a > > >flood with everyone writing support for their own favourite data > > >types. What's up? > > > > We're not q

Re: PMC support

2001-11-08 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 09:33:48PM +0100, Benoit Cerrina wrote: > I understand that PMC are what will make it possible to integrate other > languages to parrot, I'm really interested in ruby on parrot and would > appreciate if you mention this and how you see it done in your doc I don't know enou

Re: PMC support

2001-11-08 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 12:26:55PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I'm about to go missing for a few days and pound on this stuff. I'll make a > dump or two over the next few days if Simon doesn't beat me to it. Unlikely, I'm suffering a huge tuit shortage, as my inactivity hereabouts should be a c

Re: PMC support

2001-11-08 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 12:54:11PM -0500, Jason Gloudon wrote: > For example, the different between the vtable entries for set_integer and > get_integer. I was hoping to create a few of the entries, but I don't know what > is expected of them. I was just taking my lead from the vtable PDD. I have

Re: PMC support

2001-11-08 Thread Benoit Cerrina
> At 10:22 AM 11/8/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote: > >I haven't seen much activity surrounding this. I figured there'd be a > >flood with everyone writing support for their own favourite data > >types. What's up? > > We're not quite there yet with docs and environment, I think. > > I'm abou

Re: PMC support

2001-11-08 Thread Jason Gloudon
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 12:26:55PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 10:22 AM 11/8/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote: > >I haven't seen much activity surrounding this. I figured there'd be a > >flood with everyone writing support for their own favourite data > >types. What's up? > > We're not q

Re: PMC support

2001-11-08 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:22 AM 11/8/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote: >I haven't seen much activity surrounding this. I figured there'd be a >flood with everyone writing support for their own favourite data >types. What's up? We're not quite there yet with docs and environment, I think. I'm about to go missin

PMC support

2001-11-08 Thread Nathan Torkington
I haven't seen much activity surrounding this. I figured there'd be a flood with everyone writing support for their own favourite data types. What's up? Nat