Re: PGE vs bindings (was Re: embparrot still has two failures)

2006-02-06 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote: > On 2/6/06, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:34:33AM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote: > > > That seems to be a fatal error at PGE's side: > > > > > >$ echo 'rule $x:=[]' | parrot demo.pir > > >

Re: PGE vs bindings (was Re: embparrot still has two failures)

2006-02-05 Thread Audrey Tang
On 2/6/06, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:34:33AM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote: > > That seems to be a fatal error at PGE's side: > > > >$ echo 'rule $x:=[]' | parrot demo.pir > >error:imcc:syntax error, unexpected ']' > >in file 'EVAL_2' line 79

Re: PGE vs bindings (was Re: embparrot still has two failures)

2006-02-05 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:34:33AM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote: > That seems to be a fatal error at PGE's side: > >$ echo 'rule $x:=[]' | parrot demo.pir >error:imcc:syntax error, unexpected ']' >in file 'EVAL_2' line 79 I've now updated PGE (r11427) so that it provides a more useful e

PGE vs bindings (was Re: embparrot still has two failures)

2006-02-04 Thread Audrey Tang
Larry Wall wrote: > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of > Failed > --- > t/rules/from_perl6_rules/array_ca 18 460845 10 22.22% 41-45 > t/rules/from_perl6_rules/named_ca 18