On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 01:33:43PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> >
> >It did occur to me this morning that we can stick with the
> >flat-namespace model that PGE and other tools have been
> >using up-to-now, and make the switch to using multilevel namespaces
> >sometim
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
It did occur to me this morning that we can stick with the
flat-namespace model that PGE and other tools have been
using up-to-now, and make the switch to using multilevel namespaces
sometime later. Either way there's going to be a big conversion
cycle involved somew
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:27:49PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> >Slowly PGE and PGE::Perl6Regex are being updated to work with pdd15oo.
>
> What sort of changes do you end up making? It shouldn't touch anything
> other than the lines of code creating a new class and
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Slowly PGE and PGE::Perl6Regex are being updated to work with pdd15oo.
What sort of changes do you end up making? It shouldn't touch anything
other than the lines of code creating a new class and instantiating a
new object. (And really, it shouldn't even touch creati
Slowly PGE and PGE::Perl6Regex are being updated to work with pdd15oo.
Several existing tools and languages in the repo still make use of
PGE::P6Regex, which uses the regex syntax that was in Synopsis 5
prior to February 2007.
Rather than spend the time converting the P6Regex to work with pdd15