Re: PGE::P6Regex and pdd15oo

2007-10-04 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 01:33:43PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote: > Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > > >It did occur to me this morning that we can stick with the > >flat-namespace model that PGE and other tools have been > >using up-to-now, and make the switch to using multilevel namespaces > >sometim

Re: PGE::P6Regex and pdd15oo

2007-10-04 Thread Allison Randal
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: It did occur to me this morning that we can stick with the flat-namespace model that PGE and other tools have been using up-to-now, and make the switch to using multilevel namespaces sometime later. Either way there's going to be a big conversion cycle involved somew

Re: PGE::P6Regex and pdd15oo

2007-10-04 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:27:49PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote: > Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > >Slowly PGE and PGE::Perl6Regex are being updated to work with pdd15oo. > > What sort of changes do you end up making? It shouldn't touch anything > other than the lines of code creating a new class and

Re: PGE::P6Regex and pdd15oo

2007-10-04 Thread Allison Randal
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: Slowly PGE and PGE::Perl6Regex are being updated to work with pdd15oo. What sort of changes do you end up making? It shouldn't touch anything other than the lines of code creating a new class and instantiating a new object. (And really, it shouldn't even touch creati

PGE::P6Regex and pdd15oo

2007-10-03 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
Slowly PGE and PGE::Perl6Regex are being updated to work with pdd15oo. Several existing tools and languages in the repo still make use of PGE::P6Regex, which uses the regex syntax that was in Synopsis 5 prior to February 2007. Rather than spend the time converting the P6Regex to work with pdd15