We're getting wildly off topic. And there's no PDD for the JIT, either.
--
FAILURE:
When Your Best Just Isn't Good Enough
http://www.despair.com
At 9:22 AM + 2/19/02, Piers Cawley wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The first person to say "But XP says code first!" will be summarily
>> mocked, as that's completely full of crap. You have been warned. :)
>
>Actually, XP says tests/interface first and be prepared to chan
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The first person to say "But XP says code first!" will be summarily
> mocked, as that's completely full of crap. You have been warned. :)
Actually, XP says tests/interface first and be prepared to change it
if the code tells you to.
But XP is specifical
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrpote:
> Implementation should be capable of being yanked out and replaced
> with no notice, and things still work. It is, and should be,
> considered ephemeral. It's the least important thing to get right,
> since it can be fixed or completely replaced as we n
At 4:18 PM + 2/17/02, Simon Cozens wrote:
>COMMITTERS PLEASE NOTE: I'd like you to ensure that any changes you commit in
>the future, whether by yourself or anyone else, has an associated PDD. When I
>say "any", I expect you to use your discretion - things to fix up warnings,
>typoes, minor al
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Buggs wrote:
> Index: docs/pdds/pdd6.pod
Yuck! Can we not have 01_parrot.pod or something we can spot from
a distance?
I'll fix up bignum pdd-ness once I'm a bit less busy, which may not be
for a week or so.
Alex Gough
At 10:06 PM -0500 2/17/02, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>PDD 7 (coding standards) is also still MIA, although i understand that it's
>basically complete.
And now it's in. :)
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugal
At 1:42 AM +0100 2/18/02, Buggs wrote:
>And this takes care of the dublicate entries in pdd6, as they seem to have
>slipped in again.
PDD 6 was an old version. I updated it with the contents of
parrot_assembly.pod, which is the up-to-date version.
--
Dan
Bravo!
PDD 7 (coding standards) is also still MIA, although i understand that it's
basically complete.
--Josh
At 16:18 on 02/17/2002 GMT, Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just starting to think about writing something on the history and
> evolution of Parrot's design, and came
On Sunday 17 February 2002 17:18, Simon Cozens wrote:
> Yes, I'm being an anal retentive asshole. It's my job.
Nah, this time you are not ;P
On to the pdds ...
There seems to be some part missing from pdd2, at the bottom.
And this takes care of the dublicate entries in pdd6, as they seem to ha
I was just starting to think about writing something on the history and
evolution of Parrot's design, and came across some PDDs in the mail archives.
Grief, I remember these things! These were meant to document the design,
what we'd decided, why those decisions were a bad idea, what we chose inste
11 matches
Mail list logo
