On Nov 15, 2005, at 4:28, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:33:07AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
OK, call frame as PMC looks like a non-starter. Consider it rescinded.
Autrijus mentioned on #parrot that we'd need weak pointers at some
time. Then we can reconsider callfra
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:33:07AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2005, at 4:45, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > $P0 = callframe 1
>
> We already have this kind of introspection: $ grep caller t/pmc/sub.t
OK, the Interpreter PMC interface is certainly flexible enough to
handle the introsp
On Nov 13, 2005, at 4:45, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
{ First, let's have a little applause for Leo for implementing the new
lexical scheme in, what, a week? He says it was only a half-day's
work, too. Nice work, dude! }
It was just half a day. The rest of the week was spent on unicode
improvem
{ First, let's have a little applause for Leo for implementing the new
lexical scheme in, what, a week? He says it was only a half-day's
work, too. Nice work, dude! }
First some background for those of you who haven't read pdd20:
* Read pdd20.
But if you don't have time:
* LexPads are PMCs
