On Nov 28, 2005, at 22:37, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
PS: I'd forgotten the lex opcodes used to follow the *call stack*.
My unholy $DEITY, they were even more broken than I remembered.
Yes. And have supported hacks that were far beyond anything dubbed as
damian-ish (pdd20).
Re: tcl - it's
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:22:10PM -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> Tcl variables can be either globals or lexicals (inside a [proc]).
> So, all the code to get a PMC from a varname was factored out to a
> single routine that returns the right PMC (global or lexical)
> depending on call level.
I
On Nov 28, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:16:49PM -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
With patches from myself (to tcl) and leo (to parrot), partcl is once
again passing 100% of the tests, using PDD20.
Yay!
The biggest hurdle was having some arbitrary (non :lex-i
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:16:49PM -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> With patches from myself (to tcl) and leo (to parrot), partcl is once
> again passing 100% of the tests, using PDD20.
Yay!
> The biggest hurdle was having some arbitrary (non :lex-ified) parrot
> sub issue our find_lex and store_l
With patches from myself (to tcl) and leo (to parrot), partcl is once
again passing 100% of the tests, using PDD20.
The biggest hurdle was having some arbitrary (non :lex-ified) parrot
sub issue our find_lex and store_lex for us to ease transition. As
more of tcl becomes compiled, we can pr
