Fisher Mark wrote:
> The rest of us with our TVs, VCRs, and so on have only compiled
> code in our devices.
I'd buy a microwave that resets to 'JAPH' after a power failure.
Maybe. ;)
- Ken
Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> For the world of the JVM port, it's imperative that hooks be
> provided so
> that the front-end can be run independently, and a different
> back-end can be
> run (to emit bytecode of some sort).
All this also dovetails nicely with the mass-market world of embedded
devic
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 12:58 PM 8/29/00 -0500, Fisher Mark wrote:
> >Although Perl interpretation is divided into several passes (parser/lexer,
> >optimizer, tree/bytecode runner), all these passes are grouped together in
> >one binary. Under some memory-constrained conditions, it could be bett
At 12:58 PM 8/29/00 -0500, Fisher Mark wrote:
>Although Perl interpretation is divided into several passes (parser/lexer,
>optimizer, tree/bytecode runner), all these passes are grouped together in
>one binary. Under some memory-constrained conditions, it could be better if
>each pass ran as its
Although Perl interpretation is divided into several passes (parser/lexer,
optimizer, tree/bytecode runner), all these passes are grouped together in
one binary. Under some memory-constrained conditions, it could be better if
each pass ran as its own program, passing the transformed data onto the
