On Jul 20, 2005, at 9:01, Curtis Rawls wrote:
From working with the optimizer, I have some questions about the PASM
opcodes, in particular the "inout" opcodes. For example, adding
integer registers is defined by the "add(out INT, in INT, in INT)".
But if one of the input registers is also t
>From working with the optimizer, I have some questions about the PASM
opcodes, in particular the "inout" opcodes. For example, adding
integer registers is defined by the "add(out INT, in INT, in INT)".
But if one of the input registers is also the output register, it can
be simplified to "add(in
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #27671]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27671 >
Here's a patch summarized from Dan's post about the opcode explosion.
If there are no c
