Re: Objects and time

2004-02-23 Thread Harry Jackson
Leon Brocard wrote: Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether: > Objects please! I would second that. I would prefer a cool release to a cool date ;-) Harry Jackson

Tetris (was: Objects and time)

2004-02-23 Thread Jens Rieks
Hi, Am Montag, 23. Februar 2004 17:09 schrieb Leopold Toetsch: > WRT feature freeze: I'd say: Starting from Tue, 24th 8.00 GMT no more > feature patches *should* go in, *except* objects. can/should go the tetris example go in? I'am writing documentation at the moment. Converting the example to us

Re: Objects and time

2004-02-23 Thread Jonathan Worthington
- Original Message - From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 3:29 PM Subject: Objects and time > Okay, I've just trodden on one of the nasty bits of objects, proper > ordering of classes for init

Re: Objects and time

2004-02-23 Thread Simon Glover
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote: > At 05:09 PM 2/23/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > >WRT feature freeze: I'd say: Starting from Tue, 24th 8.00 GMT no more > >feature patches *should* go in, *except* objects. > > Basically that means: everyone will get really quiet and we will all w

Re: Objects and time

2004-02-23 Thread Melvin Smith
At 05:09 PM 2/23/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: WRT feature freeze: I'd say: Starting from Tue, 24th 8.00 GMT no more feature patches *should* go in, *except* objects. Basically that means: everyone will get really quiet and we will all watch Dan. >:) -Melvin

Re: Objects and time

2004-02-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, the question--shall we do objects and maybe miss the Feb 29th > release, or do the Feb 29th release and do objects for the next > release? As I think I'm only a little while off (maybe a day or so) > from getting it working, Don't post intermediate st

Re: Objects and time

2004-02-23 Thread Melvin Smith
At 10:29 AM 2/23/2004 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: So, the question--shall we do objects and maybe miss the Feb 29th release, or do the Feb 29th release and do objects for the next release? As I think I'm only a little while off (maybe a day or so) from getting it working, I'm tempted to take a mi

Re: Objects and time

2004-02-23 Thread Leon Brocard
Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether: > So, the question--shall we do objects and maybe miss the Feb 29th > release, or do the Feb 29th release and do objects for the next > release? Objects please! Leon -- Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/ scri

Objects and time

2004-02-23 Thread Dan Sugalski
Okay, I've just trodden on one of the nasty bits of objects, proper ordering of classes for initialization and destruction in the face of multiple inheritance. I'm doing the only sensible thing at the moment--I'm actively ignoring it. I've burned a few hours chasing down this rathole. So, the