At 8:04 PM +0200 4/6/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
sorry, this message was meant to go to chromatic only.
I modified my mail client setting to automatically add the mailinglist address
some weeks ago, I should revert to the old settings :-)
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 19:46, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:42
Hi,
sorry, this message was meant to go to chromatic only.
I modified my mail client setting to automatically add the mailinglist address
some weeks ago, I should revert to the old settings :-)
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 19:46, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 7:42 PM +0200 4/6/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
> >Wh
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 10:46, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 7:42 PM +0200 4/6/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
> >What do you think about a hash interface for event handling?
> >
> > newsub key, .Sub, _key_x
> > app["SDLK_x"] = key
>
> I think... I think I need to get cracking on the event handling spec.
At 7:42 PM +0200 4/6/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
What do you think about a hash interface for event handling?
newsub key, .Sub, _key_x
app["SDLK_x"] = key
I think... I think I need to get cracking on the event handling spec.
I'd prefer SDL to use parrot's built-in event handling system,
Hi!
Sorry for delay, I had less time than I expected.
On Sunday 04 April 2004 19:45, chromatic wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 10:04, Jens Rieks wrote:
> > > I think I prefer letting SDL::App be the main entry point for SDL
> > > applications, because *something* has to initialize SDL.
> >
> > So
Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> find_type app_type, 'SDL', 'App'
> or: find_type app_type, [ 'SDL', 'App' ]
No. C finds a class enum. These types are kept in an
array - no hierarchy.
> .namespace [ 'MoveLogo', 'EventHandler' ]
That *would* be:
.namespace [ 'MoveLogo'; 'Event
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:33:15PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:33, chromatic wrote:
>
> > With the improved object system in place, I've been porting the existing
> > SDL Parrot bindings.
>
> Here's a quick status update. With helpful suggestions from Jens and
> Allison, I
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:33, chromatic wrote:
> With the improved object system in place, I've been porting the existing
> SDL Parrot bindings.
Here's a quick status update. With helpful suggestions from Jens and
Allison, I've just finished porting the existing files in examples/sdl
to the new l
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 01:05, Jens Rieks wrote:
> Why are you using an underscore in front of all method and label names? They
> are indicating global labels; it is not necessary to use them for method
> names.
Habit. It's necessary for 'new', but none of the others. I'll change
it.
Allison a
Hi,
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 09:33, chromatic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the improved object system in place, I've been porting the existing
> SDL Parrot bindings. Here's a sample program that draws the friendly
> blue rectangle again:
>
> .pcc_sub _main non_prototyped, @MAIN
> load_bytecode
Hi all,
With the improved object system in place, I've been porting the existing
SDL Parrot bindings. Here's a sample program that draws the friendly
blue rectangle again:
.pcc_sub _main non_prototyped, @MAIN
load_bytecode "library/sdl_app.imc"
load_bytecode "library/sdl_rect.imc
11 matches
Mail list logo
