Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch makes the current non-portable test slightly less non-portable.
Thanks, applied.
leo
36 (the one that tries to handle negative zero). (The two Solaris
tinderboxes are still running a very old version of parrot that's
irrelevant.)
This patch makes the current non-portable test slightly less non-portable.
Better, of course, would be to have Configure.pl look for and use
signbit()
At 9:39 PM + 12/27/02, Michael Joyce (via RT) wrote:
The core parrot op neg() allows zero to become negative. That shouldn't
happen. I've attached a patch to this email that corrects the problem by
testing if neg() was passed a value of zero. I've also attached a patch that
adds a new test to
# New Ticket Created by Michael Joyce
# Please include the string: [perl #19500]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19500 >
Hello.
The core parrot op neg() allows zero to become negative. That shouldn't
happen
000
# -1.00
# 1.00
# -2.00
# '
Robin
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Joyce [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 December 2002 07:11
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Negative Zero
>
> I've just subscribed to the mailing lists, and
I've just subscribed to the mailing lists, and I'm very excited to be a part
of this. I started reading the documentation and I've been reading through
the tests. It's making a lot of sense, which is a good thing.
My question is, has there been a decision for negative zer
