[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| -- Original Message --
| From: Charles Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The whole reason I'm fooling around with nci in the first place is to
| register callbacks as described in pdd16, and it was the function
| signature of 'vCYZ' that was failing.
The docs aren't yet up
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 23:58, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
> I'm not sure this is a panic-worthy error--panics are really meant for
> cases where something has gone horribly, unfixably wrong in the
> interpreter's guts, like a critical pointer in the ParrotInterp got
> nulled out, or som
| -- Original Message --
| From: Charles Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The whole reason I'm fooling around with nci in the first place is to
| register callbacks as described in pdd16, and it was the function
| signature of 'vCYZ' that was failing.
The docs aren't yet updated, sorry. Have a loo
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It now prints an error message:
with nothing
with int 5
Parrot VM: PANIC: vt is an unknown signature type.
CAN_BUILD_CALL_FRAMES is disabled, add the signature to src/call_list.txt!
C file src/nci.c, line 4485
Parrot file (unk
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It now prints an error message:
>
> with nothing
> with int 5
> Parrot VM: PANIC: vt is an unknown signature type.
> CAN_BUILD_CALL_FRAMES is disabled, add the signature to src/call_list.txt!
> C file src/nci.c, line 4485
> Parrot file (unknown file), line 0
Hi!
On Wednesday 15 September 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there anyone who could help remove said bone from my head?
It now prints an error message:
with nothing
with int 5
Parrot VM: PANIC: vt is an unknown signature type.
CAN_BUILD_CALL_FRAMES is disabled, add the signature to src/call_
Hi all,
I'm using Ruby/wxWindows for the application I'm currently working on, but I've been
fooling around with Parrot for the past few days in the hope of writing some wxWindows
bindings to test the feasability of migrating to [cardinal | perl6]/wxWindows sometime
in the (possibly near?)futur
