Re: Re[2]: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-11-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Can we for now do it like: >> * if there is a dot in the filepart[1] leave the name as is >> * if not append PARROT_DLL_EXTENSION > That sounds reasonable, yes. You co

Re: Re[2]: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-11-07 Thread Jonathan Worthington
- Original Message - From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2003, at 3:59 PM, Jonathan Worthington wrote: > >> From: "Mattia Barbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [ shared file extensions ] > > Can we for now do it like: > * if there

Re: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-11-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jared Rhine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Leopold == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:43:04 +0100] > Leopold> [ shared file extensions ] > Leopold> Can we for now do it like: > Leopold> * if there is a dot in the filepart[1] leave the name as is > Leopold> * if not append PARROT_DLL_EXTENS

NCI Broken On Win32

2003-11-07 Thread Jared Rhine
[Leopold == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:43:04 +0100] Leopold> [ shared file extensions ] Leopold> Can we for now do it like: Leopold> * if there is a dot in the filepart[1] leave the name as is Leopold> * if not append PARROT_DLL_EXTENSION Why have any magic at all? Is there a speci

Re: Re[2]: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-11-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 6, 2003, at 3:59 PM, Jonathan Worthington wrote: >> From: "Mattia Barbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ shared file extensions ] Can we for now do it like: * if there is a dot in the filepart[1] leave the name as is * if not append PARROT_DLL_EXTENSION [1]

Re: Re[2]: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-11-06 Thread Jeff Clites
On Nov 6, 2003, at 3:59 PM, Jonathan Worthington wrote: From: "Mattia Barbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Il Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:51:56 +0100 Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, loadlib P1, "user32.dll" There are 2 errors in that, one is min

Re: Re[2]: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-11-06 Thread Jonathan Worthington
From: "Mattia Barbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Il Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:51:56 +0100 Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > > Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > loadlib P1, "user32.dll" > > > > There are 2 errors in that, one is mine :) > > - I didn't use the

Re[2]: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-11-02 Thread Mattia Barbon
Il Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:51:56 +0100 Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > loadlib P1, "user32.dll" > > There are 2 errors in that, one is mine :) > - I didn't use the configure define of PARROT_DLL_EXTENSION > - Your's is:

Re: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-10-29 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > src\jit_cpu.c(95) : error C2065: 'RTYPE_COM' : undeclared identifier >> Did you recheck that recently, I had committed a change WRT this. > I did, and I just did an update now to try it again. Same set of errors > still appear. Again, it's bec

Re: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-10-29 Thread Jonathan Worthington
> Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > src\jit_cpu.c(95) : error C2065: 'RTYPE_COM' : undeclared identifier > > Did you recheck that recently, I had committed a change WRT this. I did, and I just did an update now to try it again. Same set of errors still appear. Again, it's beca

Re: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-10-29 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > src\jit_cpu.c(95) : error C2065: 'RTYPE_COM' : undeclared identifier Did you recheck that recently, I had committed a change WRT this. > NMAKE : warning U4006: special macro undefined : '$<' > link -dll -def:libparrot.def -nologo -debug

Re: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-10-28 Thread Jonathan Worthington
> Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ah, that's changed, 'cus it used to work with me doing that. :-) So now it > > loads the library, but fails here:- > > > dlfunc P0, P1, "MessageBoxA", "llttl" > > > With:- > > > Parrot VM: PANIC: Unknown signature type! > > Your parrot seems t

Re: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-10-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, that's changed, 'cus it used to work with me doing that. :-) So now it > loads the library, but fails here:- > dlfunc P0, P1, "MessageBoxA", "llttl" > With:- > Parrot VM: PANIC: Unknown signature type! Your parrot seems to lack JIT support

Re: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-10-28 Thread Jonathan Worthington
> > loadlib P1, "user32.dll" > > There are 2 errors in that, one is mine :) > - I didn't use the configure define of PARROT_DLL_EXTENSION > - Your's is: don't append ".dll" - parrot does it Ah, that's changed, 'cus it used to work with me doing that. :-) So now it loads the library, but fails her

Re: NCI Broken On Win32

2003-10-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > loadlib P1, "user32.dll" There are 2 errors in that, one is mine :) - I didn't use the configure define of PARROT_DLL_EXTENSION - Your's is: don't append ".dll" - parrot does it BTW - are the nci tests succeeding on Win32: $ make libnci.dl

NCI Broken On Win32

2003-10-28 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Hi, The following used to work (back at the start of the month):- loadlib P1, "user32.dll" Now it results in the following error:- Couldn't load 'runtime/parrot/dynext/user32.dll.so': unknow reason Obviously, it certainly shouldn't append .so on the end, and it surely won't find user32.dll in