On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> Which may not have been a good idea :-)
>
> I’m afraid it fell through the cracks here. Could you get me on track again?
> I promise I’ll look at it today!
Sure, Liz (I don't know how you keep up with all you do!!).
I'm re-forward
Which may not have been a good idea :-)
I’m afraid it fell through the cracks here. Could you get me on track again?
I promise I’ll look at it today!
Liz
===
> On 23 Feb 2016, at 02:18, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> I gave my code to Liz.
>
> -Tom
>
> On Monday, February 22,
I gave my code to Liz.
-Tom
On Monday, February 22, 2016, Brent Laabs wrote:
> Without a code sample or statistics, there's not much we can do about it.
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Tom Browder > wrote:
>
>> Note that my read of a 10 Gb file shows no significant speed-up from
>> Rakudo
Note, according to Tux++ csv benchmarks:
http://tux.nl/Talks/CSV6/speed4.html
It looks to have gotten slightly faster at parsing CSVs.
LL
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:07 PM Brent Laabs wrote:
> Without a code sample or statistics, there's not much we can do about it.
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at
Without a code sample or statistics, there's not much we can do about it.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> Note that my read of a 10 Gb file shows no significant speed-up from
> Rakudo 2016.01 to 2016.02.
>
> Best regards,
>
> -Tom
>
Note that my read of a 10 Gb file shows no significant speed-up from
Rakudo 2016.01 to 2016.02.
Best regards,
-Tom
