Re: RFC: Patch for mingw-msys

2006-05-26 Thread Andrew Dougherty
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Joshua Gatcomb wrote: > On 5/26/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't know anything about either msys or mingw, so I don't really know > > what to recommend. > > > > I'm afraid I don't understand what a patch would actually try to do. > > From your pr

Re: RFC: Patch for mingw-msys

2006-05-26 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
On 5/26/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't know anything about either msys or mingw, so I don't really know what to recommend. I'm afraid I don't understand what a patch would actually try to do. From your previous message, it looks like sh.exe is changing the path delimiters

Re: RFC: Patch for mingw-msys

2006-05-26 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Joshua Gatcomb wrote: > All: > In tracking down why building parrot with mingw was failing, I discovered > that the culprit was having msys in my PATH even if I wasn't intentionally > trying to use it. > > There are 3 interesting things to note: > 1. It does not matter what

RFC: Patch for mingw-msys

2006-05-26 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
All: In tracking down why building parrot with mingw was failing, I discovered that the culprit was having msys in my PATH even if I wasn't intentionally trying to use it. There are 3 interesting things to note: 1. It does not matter what msys is actually called - renaming the directory to foo h

Re: MinGW/MSYS

2004-10-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Status: MinGW should work, but I ran out of time. Thanks for investigating. We'll include it in the next release. > jens leo

MinGW/MSYS

2004-10-08 Thread Jens Rieks
... compiles now, but "-lws2_32" is not yet automatically appended to the linker options. I can not run the tests because the ICU version bundled with parrot does not support MinGW and my system ICU is currently not working due to an experiment conducted earlier today. Status: MinGW should wor