Re: Microbenchmark JVM<->PVM

2001-09-15 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Leon -- > Sky asked me if anyone had done any simple benchmarks comparing JVM > and PVM at this point. Now, I know we're still at an early stage and > haven't really looked at speed, but a trivial counting and simple > arithmetic benchmark: Here's an implementation of the code in Jako. I haven't

Re: Microbenchmark JVM<->PVM

2001-09-15 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Don't have Blackdown installed but here are some timing and profiling results (linux/x86, compiled with -pg, 'gprof test_prog' output, remembering the caveat of profiling always skewing the measurements): ugli:/tmp/jhi/parrot ; time ./test_prog j.pbc r 119,14s u 119,14s s 0,00s 100% "./test_prog

Re: Microbenchmark JVM<->PVM

2001-09-15 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 09:23 PM 9/15/2001 +0900, Masatake E. Hori wrote: > > piglet$ time java Bench > > 1.470u 0.080s 0:01.59 97.4% 0+0k 0+0io 5784pf+0w > > piglet$ time ./test_prog run.pbc > > 40.080u 0.030s 0:42.07 95.3% 0+0k 0+0io 137pf+0w > >Maybe you got a Just-In-Time compiler? >I turned mine off and I got,

Re: Microbenchmark JVM<->PVM

2001-09-15 Thread Simon Cozens
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:16:55PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: > piglet$ time java Bench > 1.470u 0.080s 0:01.59 97.4% 0+0k 0+0io 5784pf+0w > piglet$ time ./test_prog run.pbc > 40.080u 0.030s 0:42.07 95.3% 0+0k 0+0io 137pf+0w We're really 40 times slower than Blackdown? Shite. What're we doing

Microbenchmark JVM<->PVM

2001-09-15 Thread Leon Brocard
Sky asked me if anyone had done any simple benchmarks comparing JVM and PVM at this point. Now, I know we're still at an early stage and haven't really looked at speed, but a trivial counting and simple arithmetic benchmark: piglet$ time java Bench 1.470u 0.080s 0:01.59 97.4% 0+0k 0+0io 5784p