On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:27:48PM -0700, David Whipp wrote:
> > it looks like "Lukasiewiczian NULL" is just the nifty NULL
> > that SQL has, and the nifty ways that it affects logical
> > and aggregate operations. Actually, something I wouldn't mind
> > seeing in other languages -- I can't say if
> it looks like "Lukasiewiczian NULL" is just the nifty NULL
> that SQL has, and the nifty ways that it affects logical
> and aggregate operations. Actually, something I wouldn't mind
> seeing in other languages -- I can't say if perl is one of those,
> but if it can be provided by expansion, that
From: Andrew Rodland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> After much fighting with google to find the right spelling,
Sorry bout that. Your searching was probably as difficult as my attempts
to pronounce it.
> it looks like "Lukasiewiczian NULL" is just the nifty NULL
> that SQL has, and the nifty ways that it
