Roger Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Added an entry for "Amber for parrot" to languages/LANGUAGES.STATUS
Thanks, applied - r8281
> PS: The "Patch Submission Instructions" page
> http://www.parrotcode.org/patchfaq.html
> says "do a diff -u"
# New Ticket Created by Roger Browne
# Please include the string: [perl #36136]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36136 >
1. Added an entry for "Amber for parrot" to languages/LANGUAGES.STAT
Bernhard Schmalhofer (via RT) wrote:
the two new languages 'Span' and 'Parakeet' should be mentioned in
LANGUAGES.STATUS.
Thanks, applied.
leo
should be mentioned in
LANGUAGES.STATUS.
I see that LANGUAGES.STATUS is in a funny text format. Would it be useful to
transform it into something like YAML?
CU, Bernhard
--
/* [EMAIL PROTECTED] */
NEU: WLAN-Router fïr 0,- EUR* - auch fïr DSL-Wechsler!
GMX DSL = supergïnstig & kabellos h
this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27308 >
This patch modifies ./languages/LANGUAGES.STATUS, breaking the current
BASIC entry into separate BASIC/compiler and BASIC/interpreter entries.
Why? The ./languages/BASIC directory has two independent subprojects,
./languages/BA
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #27308]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27308 >
This patch modifies ./languages/LANGUAGES.STATUS, breaking the current
BA
Mitchell N Charity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
>
> I found (on linux x86 [1]):
>
> These languages failed to build:
> BASIC/interpreter
> jako
> miniperl
> tcl
>
> And these languages were quite broken (bad mak
Andrew Dougherty wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
Just to round out the record, here's a summary of what I got on
Solaris 8, with Sun's compiler and Sun's perl5.005_03 for
'make languages' and 'make l
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
> (1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
Just to round out the record, here's a summary of what I got on
Solaris 8, with Sun's compiler and Sun's perl5.005_03 for
'make languages' and 'make languages-test':
ma
On Saturday 28 February 2004 02:17 pm, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
>> And these languages were quite broken (bad make test failures):
>
> [...]
>
>> m4
>
> [...]
>
>> scheme
>
>M4 and scheme pass all tests for me, on Gentoo Linux. myconfig is:
>
> Ok, they both fail on my perl
?? % ??
t/basic/004_define.t 255 65280?? ?? % ??
t/basic/005_define_with_blanks.t 255 65280?? ?? % ??
t/basic/006_define_with_rest.t255 65280?? ?? % ??
t/basic/007_empty_line.t 255 65280?? ?? % ??
t/basic/008_two_tests.t
: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:10:05 -0500
Subject: Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Saturday 28 February 2004 01:12 am, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
> (1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
>
> I found (on linux x86 [1]):
>
> These languages failed to build:
> BASIC/interpreter
> jako
> miniperl
> tcl
>
> And these languages were qui
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:10:05 -0500
Subject: Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PR
-- Gregor
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 22:12, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
> (1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
>
> I found (on linux x86 [1]):
>
> These languages failed to build:
> BASIC/interpreter
> jako
> miniperl
> tcl
>
> And these languages were
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, at 01:12 AM, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
I found (on linux x86 [1]):
These languages failed to build:
BASIC/interpreter
jako
miniperl
tcl
tcl failed to build? What was the error?
(my current repository doesn't
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
I found (on linux x86 [1]):
These languages failed to build:
BASIC/interpreter
jako
miniperl
tcl
And these languages were quite broken (bad make test failures):
BASIC/compiler [2]
m4
ruby
scheme
LANGUAGES.STATUS says they all work.
If my
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
>
>> Luke Palmer writes:
>> > Hi Jos,
>> >
>> > Jos Visser writes:
>> > > Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
>>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > There it goes again! That was *supposed* to be off-list!
> >
> > Well, now the entirety of the internals list can learn about English
> > grammar. Hoo-ray.
>
> You mean "American Grammar".
dea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
If people agree that it's a good idea I would like to submit the
following three liner:
OpenComal C
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Luke Palmer writes:
> > Hi Jos,
> >
> > Jos Visser writes:
> > > Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
> > > LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
&
Luke Palmer writes:
> Hi Jos,
>
> Jos Visser writes:
> > Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
> > LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
> > compilers that are not in the main tree?
>
> Yeah, that
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
> Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
> LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
> compilers that are not in the main tree?
Yeah, that's English. "Mightn't" is an archaic
way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
If people agree that it's a good idea I would like to submit the
following three liner:
-
Hi,
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
If people agree that it's a good idea I would like to submit the
following t
25 matches
Mail list logo
