On Oct 5, 2005, at 6:18 AM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* what's the ratio of globals to subroutines? (smaller is better)
Does that include file-scoped lexicals? ’Cause in that case I
disagree – I’m just overhauling a module, in which process I’m
also moving it to inside-out object style, and so I’v
* Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-05 12:20]:
> Things that PPI/Perl::Critic could judge that might lead to
> quantitative, non-controversial metrics:
Pretty good suggests, but I think the following may have to be
lessened:
> * what's the ratio of globals to subroutines? (smaller is bett
Unless someone wants to start helping implement this right now, I'd ask
that you not spend too much time on anything that relates to
Kwalitee/PPI integration (which includes Perl::Critic).
There's a couple of steps that have to be taken in order to make this
happen, and I'm working through the
On Oct 4, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Nik Clayton wrote:
I don't have strong opinions about this yet, but has anyone else
looked at the Perl::Critic suite of modules on CPAN?
It occurs to me that:
a) Kwalitee metrics could quite easily be implemented as
Perl::Critic plugins.
b) The plugins that it
I don't have strong opinions about this yet, but has anyone else looked
at the Perl::Critic suite of modules on CPAN?
It occurs to me that:
a) Kwalitee metrics could quite easily be implemented as Perl::Critic
plugins.
b) The plugins that it ships with (based on Perl Best Practices) may
for
