Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:43:43 -0700
From: James Ellis Osborne III
To: Shlomi Fish
Subject: Re: Perl 6: Protecting Intellectual Property for Commercial Code
As another aside (That
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:57:20 -0700
James Ellis Osborne III wrote:
> This particular app was .pyd files locked with calls to a C dll. Source
> code is reconstructable but for an app of more than a few thousand lines
> it's highly unlikely anyone is going to go rebuilding it all.
>
> If your goal
Hi James,
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:19:34 -0700
James Ellis Osborne III wrote:
> Is compilation to bytecode still a todo feature? I managed to get a
> solution supporting compilation, serial-based locking, & license expiration
> delivered in Python last month for the nuclear industry.. Bytecode
>
;> Is there a Perl 6 roadmap that might mention compiling Perl 6
>> modules/scripts
>> into something atomic, binary, & relocatable? Or preferably the
>> capability
>> to compile only specific Perl 6 modules, requiring an existing Perl 6 on
>> the
>> ta
et host?
>
Please see
https://github.com/shlomif/Freenode-programming-channel-FAQ/blob/master/FAQ.mdwn#how-do-i-hideobscureencrypt-my-source-code-to-prevent-end-users-from-learning-how-it-works
.
Regarding "Intellectual Property", see
https://
Perl 6 Users,
[[ Bouncing off Re: who own my code? ]]
This is the first of several possible spin-off questions, but here goes…
Perl 6 has its public ecosystem, which will drive growth and adoption. Then
there’s the commercial side, which would also drive the language from another
important an
At 9:47 PM + 11/21/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
What steps are being taken to ensure that patches/code donations to Parrot
are free from potential intellectual property concerns?
At the moment we're relying on the integrity of the people submitting
patches, with the assumption that people submi
