On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
> My brain was in PMC == class mode when I wrote what I wrote above, but
> now I need to rethink, since that's not a given (yet?).
Not a given ever. PMCs may have a backing namespace, and that namespace
may be a HLL class, but it might not.
The terminology
Leopold Toetsch writes:
> I think that for supporting Ruby or such we have to keep fences between
> PMCs and "real objects" very low.
Agreed, or have some sort of automagic transformation possible.
> So it should be possible to define an Imaginary Number class that
> inherits from two (Perl?)Num
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
>> What do you mean by "new method in the class" above?
> In this case, the "new method" is a named method in the class namespace
> that we look up and call. We'd look it up and dispatch to it.
A more low level lik
On Oct 15, 2003, at 1:48 PM, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 03:49 PM 10/15/2003 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2003, at 8:36 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at
least
> > single-inheritance objects
At 03:49 PM 10/15/2003 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2003, at 8:36 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
> > single-inheritance objects up and running.
> >
> > At the moment, I'm torn bet
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2003, at 8:36 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
> > single-inheritance objects up and running.
> >
> > At the moment, I'm torn between just having a new method of some sort
> > in
On Oct 15, 2003, at 8:36 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
single-inheritance objects up and running.
At the moment, I'm torn between just having a new method of some sort
in
the class and having a vtable method on the class PMC that retu
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
> single-inheritance objects up and running.
> At the moment, I'm torn between just having a new method of some sort in
> the class and having a vtable method on the class PMC that return
I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
single-inheritance objects up and running.
At the moment, I'm torn between just having a new method of some sort in
the class and having a vtable method on the class PMC that returns an
object of that class. (get_pmc on the class
