Re: Initial patch for pdd15 testing.

2007-05-18 Thread Allison Randal
Another one wiped out by Thunderbird crash. tewk wrote: Allison Randal wrote: tewk wrote: Patch was to large to attach so: http://tewk.com/pdd15_testing.diff Tests currently fail because they use the "new" opcode to instantiate objects. Fixing the 'new' opcode is the first change we need

Re: Initial patch for pdd15 testing.

2007-05-09 Thread tewk
Allison Randal wrote: tewk wrote: Patch was to large to attach so: http://tewk.com/pdd15_testing.diff Tests currently fail because they use the "new" opcode to instantiate objects. Fixing the 'new' opcode is the first change we need to make to get both object models working simultaneously.

Re: Initial patch for pdd15 testing.

2007-05-08 Thread Allison Randal
tewk wrote: Patch was to large to attach so: http://tewk.com/pdd15_testing.diff Tests currently fail because they use the "new" opcode to instantiate objects. Fixing the 'new' opcode is the first change we need to make to get both object models working simultaneously. Pick one: - The 'new'

Initial patch for pdd15 testing.

2007-05-08 Thread tewk
Patch was to large to attach so: http://tewk.com/pdd15_testing.diff Tests currently fail because they use the "new" opcode to instantiate objects. So are we going to need a newobject opcode or an instantiate opcode. I would prefer an "instantiate" opcode to $P0 = get_class "Classname" $P1 = $P